"jkm7680" (jkm7680)
07/04/2016 at 18:54 • Filed to: None
0
15|
"jkm7680" (jkm7680)
07/04/2016 at 18:54 • Filed to: None | 0
| 15 |
But what is it? Under 100k and looks like it was used for towing a lot. Slight lift, but otherwise look about stock. Can’t see any rust either, only $9,000?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Nibby
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 18:57 |
|
The catch: 6.0L engine
BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 18:58 |
|
200k? You mean 200,000 miles...
Birddog
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 19:04 |
|
Grrr.. It’s about $2000 too high for me.
I’m warming up to Oil burners though.
XJDano
> BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind
07/04/2016 at 19:05 |
|
k usually is referred to in thousands of miles. My metro has 265k miles, and Equinox 175k miles. One times the miles is omitted.
HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles
> BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind
07/04/2016 at 19:17 |
|
As long as the oil was changed regularly the 6.0 shouldn't be a problem. And if it wasn't then the problems would have shown the,selves 30-50 thousand miles ago.
CRider
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 19:18 |
|
Rollin’ in my 6.0, towing shit when my engine blows...
LOREM IPSUM
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 19:24 |
|
Company I used to work for had a similar one. 10 grand in engine work later it was still fucked. Afterwards the shop convinced them they needed one of those plug in tuning dealios, because towing, which obviously didn’t resolve the issue the truck was having either.
Then they flipped it. Poor unsuspecting schmuck.
So, yeah... no.
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 19:59 |
|
350 instead of 250, and 6.0.
|
BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind
> XJDano
07/04/2016 at 20:16 |
|
Yeah I know...OP had stated that it was “less than $100k”, which unless he's describing the price, isn't true.
|
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> jkm7680
07/04/2016 at 20:54 |
|
Also, it says F-250, but that is sitting exactly like a 350 SRW, which tend to go for less. It would explain the lift, and the lower value. Plus, it’s a 6.0 with 195k miles. If it hasn’t been bulletproofed by now, it’s likely fine, but still.
|
XJDano
> BrianGriffin thinks “reliable” is just a state of mind
07/04/2016 at 20:55 |
|
I didn't see the $$Bill sign, covert edit I suppose.
RallyWrench
> jkm7680
07/05/2016 at 00:44 |
|
Fun fact: the cab has to come off to do a turbo. Also, it's just in time to need a trans, they're made of glass. My rule of thumb is, if it's not a 7.3 it's crap.
That Bastard Kurtis - An Attempt to Standardize My Username Across Platforms
> jkm7680
07/05/2016 at 06:48 |
|
200k miles on a 6 liter is the catch. If it's been bulletproofed it's fine, but if there's no paperwork to support it I'd stay away. Would be a nice price if it were a 7.3 or even a 6.4.
Saracen
> That Bastard Kurtis - An Attempt to Standardize My Username Across Platforms
07/11/2016 at 18:05 |
|
The 6.4 has its own horrendous set of problems, a lot of which comes from the DPF and SCR systems required.. Consensus seems to be a BP’d 6.0 is better than the 6.4.
|
That Bastard Kurtis - An Attempt to Standardize My Username Across Platforms
> Saracen
07/11/2016 at 18:26 |
|
That's interesting. My truck is a 7.3, so I don't worry about any of that anyway, haha.